Commonwealth v. Haag

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Haag

957 A.2d 226

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 18, 2008·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 18th day of September 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Whether Petitioner’s first DUI offense, which occurred less than two hours before a subsequent DUI offense, qualifies as a “prior offense” under 75 PA.C.S. § 3806 for purposes of sentencing, even though Petitioner had not been convicted of the first DUI offense at the time the subsequent DUI offense was committed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 18th day of September 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Whether Petitioner’s first DUI offense, which occurred less than two hours before a subsequent DUI offense, qualifies as a “prior offense” under 75 PA.C.S. § 3806 for purposes of sentencing, even though Petitioner had not been convicted of the first DUI offense at the time the subsequent DUI offense was committed.

Commonwealth v. Haag, 957 A.2d 226 (Pa. 2008).

Pincite

957 A.2d 226 (Commonwealth v. Haag) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related