Commonwealth v. Haag

957 A.2d 226
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedSeptember 18, 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 957 A.2d 226 (Commonwealth v. Haag) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Haag, 957 A.2d 226 (Pa. 2008).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 18th day of September 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Whether Petitioner’s first DUI offense, which occurred less than two hours before a subsequent DUI offense, qualifies as a “prior offense” under 75 PA.C.S. § 3806 for purposes of sentencing, even though Petitioner had not been convicted of the first DUI offense at the time the subsequent DUI offense was committed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Haag
981 A.2d 902 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
957 A.2d 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-haag-pa-2008.