Commonwealth v. Gumber
718 A.2d 270, 553 Pa. 86, 1998 Pa. LEXIS 1827
Opinions
ORDER.
The Court being evenly divided, the Order of the Superior Court is affirmed.
NIGRO, J., files a concurring statement, joined by CAPPY, J., who also joins the per curiam affirmance.
CASTILLE, J., files a dissenting statement in which FLAHERTY, C.J., and NEWMAN, J., join.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Gumber, 718 A.2d 270, 553 Pa. 86, 1998 Pa. LEXIS 1827 (Pa. 1998).
718 A.2d 270 (Commonwealth v. Gumber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Young
572 A.2d 1217 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1990)
Commonwealth v. Sohmer
546 A.2d 601 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1988)