Commonwealth v. Gumber

718 A.2d 270, 553 Pa. 86, 1998 Pa. LEXIS 1827
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedAugust 25, 1998
StatusPublished

This text of 718 A.2d 270 (Commonwealth v. Gumber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Gumber, 718 A.2d 270, 553 Pa. 86, 1998 Pa. LEXIS 1827 (Pa. 1998).

Opinions

ORDER.

PER CURIAM:

The Court being evenly divided, the Order of the Superior Court is affirmed.

NIGRO, J., files a concurring statement, joined by CAPPY, J., who also joins the per curiam affirmance.

CASTILLE, J., files a dissenting statement in which FLAHERTY, C.J., and NEWMAN, J., join.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Young
572 A.2d 1217 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1990)
Commonwealth v. Sohmer
546 A.2d 601 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
718 A.2d 270, 553 Pa. 86, 1998 Pa. LEXIS 1827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-gumber-pa-1998.