Commonwealth v. Groff

357 A.2d 172, 239 Pa. Super. 715
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 8, 1976
DocketAppeal, No. 1888
StatusPublished

This text of 357 A.2d 172 (Commonwealth v. Groff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Groff, 357 A.2d 172, 239 Pa. Super. 715 (Pa. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Case remanded to lower court to allow appellant to file a petition to withdraw his guilty plea nunc pro tunc. See Commonwealth v. Roberts, 237 Pa. Superior Ct. 336 (1975) and Commonwealth v. Velasquez, 238 Pa. Superior Ct. 368 (1976).

Watkins, P.J., and Price, J., dissent on the basis of [716]*716the dissenting opinion in Commonwealth v. Roberts, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Velasquez
357 A.2d 155 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1976)
Commonwealth v. Roberts
352 A.2d 140 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
357 A.2d 172, 239 Pa. Super. 715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-groff-pasuperct-1976.