Commonwealth v. Grimes

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Grimes

984 A.2d 477, 603 Pa. 396, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 2410

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commonwealth v. Grimes. Read the opinion of the Court — 607 Pa. 523 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 10, 2009·No. 11 WAL 2009·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 10th day of November, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Did the trial court properly deny a motion to suppress physical evidence seized from a jacket that had been discarded by a person under surveillance in a high crime area after he observed and had fled from police who had not yet engaged in any pursuit?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 10th day of November, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Did the trial court properly deny a motion to suppress physical evidence seized from a jacket that had been discarded by a person under surveillance in a high crime area after he observed and had fled from police who had not yet engaged in any pursuit?

Commonwealth v. Grimes, 984 A.2d 477, 603 Pa. 396, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 2410 (Pa. 2009).

Pincite

984 A.2d 477 (Commonwealth v. Grimes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related