Commonwealth v. Grimes
This text of 413 A.2d 389 (Commonwealth v. Grimes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
This is a direct appeal from a judgment of sentence after a finding of murder of the third degree. Appellant contends (a) that his confession was unknowing and involuntary and therefore improperly admitted into evidence against him; (b) that the trial court improperly admitted his confession since the Commonwealth had failed to establish a corpus delicti and (c) that the evidence did not establish malice to sustain the murder conviction. We have considered all of these contentions and find them to be without merit.
Judgment of sentence is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
413 A.2d 389, 488 Pa. 604, 1980 Pa. LEXIS 578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-grimes-pa-1980.