Commonwealth v. Griffith
4 A.3d 608, 607 Pa. 100, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2094
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 14th day of September, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is
Whether expert testimony is required to prove that the amount of a controlled substance found in a defendant’s blood or urine caused the driving impairment charged under 75 Pa.C.S. § 3802(d).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Griffith, 4 A.3d 608, 607 Pa. 100, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2094 (Pa. Ct. App. 2010).
4 A.3d 608 (Commonwealth v. Griffith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Griffith
32 A.3d 1231 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)