Commonwealth v. Griffith
4 A.3d 608, 607 Pa. 100, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2094
This text of 4 A.3d 608 (Commonwealth v. Griffith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Griffith, 4 A.3d 608, 607 Pa. 100, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2094 (Pa. Ct. App. 2010).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 14th day of September, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is
Whether expert testimony is required to prove that the amount of a controlled substance found in a defendant’s blood or urine caused the driving impairment charged under 75 Pa.C.S. § 3802(d).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Commonwealth v. Griffith
32 A.3d 1231 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 A.3d 608, 607 Pa. 100, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2094, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-griffith-pacommwct-2010.