Commonwealth v. Griffith
4 A.3d 608, 607 Pa. 100
This text of 4 A.3d 608 (Commonwealth v. Griffith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Griffith, 4 A.3d 608, 607 Pa. 100 (Pa. 2010).
Opinion
[101]*101 ORDER
AND NOW, this 14th day of September, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is
Whether expert testimony is required to prove that the amount of a controlled substance found in a defendant’s blood or urine caused the driving impairment charged under 75 Pa.C.S. § 3802(d).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
§ 3802
Pennsylvania § 3802(d)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 A.3d 608, 607 Pa. 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-griffith-pa-2010.