Commonwealth v. Greenlee
This text of 414 A.2d 627 (Commonwealth v. Greenlee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
On appeal, the appellant raises the following issues:
(1) whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain his conviction for second degree murder;
(2) whether the trial judge erred in excluding a potential juror who was adamantly opposed to the death penalty;
(3) whether the prosecutor committed reversible error by his reference to photograph identification; and
(4) whether the trial judge erred by not granting a mistrial after the prosecutor’s opening statement that he represented the Commonwealth, as well as the defendant, a member of the Commonwealth.
We find that each allegation of error is without merit and affirm the judgment of sentence of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
414 A.2d 627, 489 Pa. 489, 1980 Pa. LEXIS 655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-greenlee-pa-1980.