Commonwealth v. Gray

249 A.2d 362, 213 Pa. Super. 777
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedDecember 6, 1968
DocketAppeal, No. 72
StatusPublished

This text of 249 A.2d 362 (Commonwealth v. Gray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Gray, 249 A.2d 362, 213 Pa. Super. 777 (Pa. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam:

It appearing that petitioner’s plea of nolo contendere, without counsel, was introduced at his trial (White v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 59 (1963)), the order is vacated and the record remanded for a hearing to determine if appellant waived counsel at his preliminary hearing. If the court finds an intelligent waiver, appellant is not entitled to relief. In the event the court finds no intelligent waiver of counsel at the preliminary hearing, appellant is entitled to a new trial. Commonwealth ex rel. Firmstone v. Myers, 431 Pa. 628, 246 A. 2d 371 (1968).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

White v. Maryland
373 U.S. 59 (Supreme Court, 1963)
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Firmstone v. Myers
246 A.2d 371 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
249 A.2d 362, 213 Pa. Super. 777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-gray-pasuperct-1968.