Commonwealth v. Gray

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Gray

922 A.2d 871

DecidedApril 4, 2007

StatusPublished

This text of 922 A.2d 871 (Commonwealth v. Gray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Gray, 922 A.2d 871 (Pa. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 4th day of April 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED in part, and decision of the Superior Court is REVERSED to the extent that the court sua sponte removed the sentencing judge on remand, as that directive exceeded the Superior Court’s authority. See Commonwealth v. Whitmore, 912 A.2d 827 (Pa.2006). The matter is remanded to the Superior Court for remand to the trial court consistently with this Order.

Justice FITZGERALD did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 4th day of April 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED in part, and decision of the Superior Court is REVERSED to the extent that the court sua sponte removed the sentencing judge on remand, as that directive exceeded the Superior Court’s authority. See Commonwealth v. Whitmore, 912 A.2d 827 (Pa.2006). The matter is remanded to the Superior Court for remand to the trial court consistently with this Order.

Justice FITZGERALD did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

922 A.2d 871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-gray-pa-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack