Commonwealth v. Graham
963 A.2d 901
This text of 963 A.2d 901 (Commonwealth v. Graham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Graham, 963 A.2d 901 (Pa. 2008).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 16th day of December, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
Did the Superior Court err in affirming the lower court’s decision regarding the grading of count four burglary as a felony of the first degree, burglary of an occupied structure, when the facts clearly indicate that the structure was unoccupied at the time of the burglary and had not yet been adapted for overnight accommodation; and whether the Superior Court has misapplied the plain meaning of 18 Pa.C.S. § 3501 by relying on Commonwealth v. Nixon, 801 A.2d 1241 (Pa.Super.2002)?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Commonwealth v. Nixon
801 A.2d 1241 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2002)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
963 A.2d 901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-graham-pa-2008.