Commonwealth v. Gosha

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Gosha

479 A.2d 85, 84 Pa. Commw. 466, 1984 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1633

CourtCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedAugust 8, 1984

DocketAppeals, Nos. 658 C.D. 1982 and 746 C.D. 1982

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 479 A.2d 85 (Commonwealth v. Gosha) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Gosha, 479 A.2d 85, 84 Pa. Commw. 466, 1984 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1633 (Pa. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Palladino,

The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (¡Commonwealth) appeals here from an opinion and order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County (trial court) which denied the Commonwealth’s and the City of Philadelphia’s alternative motions for judgment n.o.v. or a new trial. We affirm.

Inasmuch as (1) the issues raised by the Commonwealth before this Court are identical to those raised before the trial court and (2) we conclude, after a careful review of the record and applicable case law, that the trial court correctly disposed of these issues, we affirm on the basis of the able and comprehensive opinion of the Honorable I. Raymond Keemeb in Edward Gosha, Administrator of the Estate of Minnie Williams v. City of Philadelphia et al., 30 Pa. D. & C. 3d 190 (1982).

Obdeb

And Now, August 8, 1984, the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County at No. 6032 is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI