Commonwealth v. Gordon

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Gordon

911 A.2d 505, 590 Pa. 8, 2006 Pa. LEXIS 2167

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 8, 2006·No. Appeal 224 EAL 2006·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 8TH day of November, 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, limited to the following:

Does it violate the United States and/or Pennsylvania Constitutions when a judge, not a jury, finds by a preponderance of the evidence, not beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant has been convicted of two or more “crimes of violence arising from separate criminal transactions” pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 9714?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 8TH day of November, 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, limited to the following:

Does it violate the United States and/or Pennsylvania Constitutions when a judge, not a jury, finds by a preponderance of the evidence, not beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant has been convicted of two or more “crimes of violence arising from separate criminal transactions” pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 9714?

Commonwealth v. Gordon, 911 A.2d 505, 590 Pa. 8, 2006 Pa. LEXIS 2167 (Pa. 2006).

Pincite

911 A.2d 505 (Commonwealth v. Gordon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related