Commonwealth v. Gomez

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Gomez

184 A.3d 543

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 18, 2018

DocketNo. 525 EAL 2017

StatusPublished

This text of 184 A.3d 543 (Commonwealth v. Gomez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Gomez, 184 A.3d 543 (Pa. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 18^th day of April, 2018, upon consideration of the Petition for Allowance of Appeal in the above captioned case, the decision of the Superior Court is VACATED and the case is REMANDED for further review. In so doing, the Superior Court shall determine, by remand to the trial court if necessary, whether the omission of the transcripts was attributable to Petitioner or a breakdown in the court system. See Commonwealth v. Almodorar, 610 Pa. 368, 20 A.3d 466 (2011); Commonwealth v. Williams, 552 Pa. 451, 715 A.2d 1101 (1998).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 18^th day of April, 2018, upon consideration of the Petition for Allowance of Appeal in the above captioned case, the decision of the Superior Court is VACATED and the case is REMANDED for further review. In so doing, the Superior Court shall determine, by remand to the trial court if necessary, whether the omission of the transcripts was attributable to Petitioner or a breakdown in the court system. See Commonwealth v. Almodorar, 610 Pa. 368, 20 A.3d 466 (2011); Commonwealth v. Williams, 552 Pa. 451, 715 A.2d 1101 (1998).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

184 A.3d 543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-gomez-pa-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack