Commonwealth v. Gomez, E.
This text of Commonwealth v. Gomez, E. (Commonwealth v. Gomez, E.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 525 EAL 2017 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Unpublished Memorandum and v. : Order of the Superior Court at No. : 3035 EDA 2016 entered on August : 22, 2017, affirming the Judgment of ELI O. GOMEZ, : Sentence of the Philadelphia County : Court of Common Pleas at No. CP-51- Petitioner : CR-0007943-2014 entered on April : 14, 2016
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 18th day of April, 2018, upon consideration of the Petition for
Allowance of Appeal in the above captioned case, the decision of the Superior Court is
VACATED and the case is REMANDED for further review. In so doing, the Superior
Court shall determine, by remand to the trial court if necessary, whether the omission of
the transcripts was attributable to Petitioner or a breakdown in the court system. See
Commonwealth v. Almodorar, 20 A.3d 466 (Pa. 2011); Commonwealth v. Williams, 715
A.2d 1101 (Pa. 1998).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Commonwealth v. Gomez, E., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-gomez-e-pa-2018.