Commonwealth v. Goldhammer

505 A.2d 601, 509 Pa. 546, 1986 Pa. LEXIS 1068
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 28, 1986·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

AND NOW, this 28th day of February, 1986, in accordance with the mandate of the United States Supreme Court entered December 12, 1985 at No. 84-1852, and upon consideration of the requests of the parties for rebriefing and reargument, it is hereby ordered that the above-captioned matter shall be listed for argument at the April, 1986 Session of Court in Philadelphia. The parties herein are specifically directed to brief the issue of the applicability of United States v. DiFrancesco, 449 U.S. 117, 101 S.Ct. 426, 66 L.Ed.2d 328 (1980), under the federal Double Jeopardy Clause, and any relevant issues under Pennsylvania constitutional and statutory law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Goldhammer, 505 A.2d 601, 509 Pa. 546, 1986 Pa. LEXIS 1068 (Pa. 1986).

505 A.2d 601 (Commonwealth v. Goldhammer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Hipp
551 A.2d 1086 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1988)