Commonwealth v. Gleason
110 Mass. 66
Opinion
The indictment is signed by the foreman of the grand jury as follows: “A. Burbank, foreman.” If we assume that the signature contains only the initial letter of his Christian name, it is sufficient; and though the motion to quash states the objection made to the indictment in various ways, nothing more appears to have been intended by it.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Gleason, 110 Mass. 66 (Mass. 1872).
110 Mass. 66 (Commonwealth v. Gleason) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
W. B. Manufacturing Co. v. Rubenstein
236 Mass. 215 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1920)
State v. Orrick
106 Mo. 111 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1891)
Wiebbold v. Hermann
2 Mont. 609 (Montana Supreme Court, 1877)
Dutton v. Simmons
65 Me. 583 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1876)