Commonwealth v. Gillespie
Opinion
Whether pumping an oil well on the Sabhath is a work of necessity, within the meaning of the act of April 22, 1794, is a question of fact; and it has been decided against the defendants by the learned judge of the court below. It is idle, and a great waste of time, to bring such questions here upon a certiorari. The act of April 26,1855, P. L. 321, under which the fines [548] were imposed in these cases, does not provide for an appeal; and upon the writ of certiorari, as we have said in at least a hundred cases, we cannot review the evidence.
Judgment affirmed.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
23 A. 393 (Commonwealth v. Gillespie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.