Commonwealth v. Gilbert

279 A.2d 337, 218 Pa. Super. 198, 1971 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1646
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 15, 1971
DocketAppeals, Nos. 1541, 1542, and 1543
StatusPublished

This text of 279 A.2d 337 (Commonwealth v. Gilbert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Gilbert, 279 A.2d 337, 218 Pa. Super. 198, 1971 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1646 (Pa. Ct. App. 1971).

Opinion

Opinion by

Cebcone, J.,

This case involves the exact procedural problem presented in Commonwealth v. Rosenberger, 218 Pa. Superior Ct. 95, 279 A. 2d 308 (1971) and Commonwealth v. Neil, 218 Pa. Superior Ct. 197, 279 A. 2d 336 (1971). For the reasons stated in my opinions in those two cases, we reverse that part of the Post Conviction Hearing Act court’s decision which grants appellant the right to direct appeal nunc pro tunc. In all other respects we affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Rosenberger
279 A.2d 308 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1971)
Commonwealth v. Neil
279 A.2d 336 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
279 A.2d 337, 218 Pa. Super. 198, 1971 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-gilbert-pasuperct-1971.