Commonwealth v. Gikami
This text of 86 A.3d 863 (Commonwealth v. Gikami) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 11th day of March 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the Superior Court’s decision is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED. to the Common Pleas Court for further proceedings consistent with Commonwealth v. Holmes, — Pa. -, 79 A.3d 562 (2013).
Mr. Justice Stevens would deny, clarifying that he would not want to encourage trial courts to automatically accept claims of ineffectiveness simply because of the [864]*864alleged failure of counsel to mention deportation as a possible consequence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
86 A.3d 863, 624 Pa. 560, 2014 WL 943189, 2014 Pa. LEXIS 663, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-gikami-pa-2014.