Commonwealth v. George
This text of 13 Pa. Super. 542 (Commonwealth v. George) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The first assignment of error cannot be sustained. The court is not bound to entertain a motion to direct a verdict of acquittal until the conclusion of all the testimony. The second assignment raises the question as to the sufficiency of the testimony to warrant a conviction. After a careful consideration of the evidence we are not convinced that the court committed error in submitting the question to the jury.
The judgment is affirmed and the record is remitted to the court below .to the end that the sentence be fully carried into -effect.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 Pa. Super. 542, 1900 Pa. Super. LEXIS 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-george-pasuperct-1900.