Commonwealth v. Geddes
This text of 391 A.2d 1014 (Commonwealth v. Geddes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
This is an appeal
(1) trial counsel was ineffective for advising appellants to plead guilty to second degree murder;
[535]*535(2) there was an inadequate factual basis for the trial judge’s acceptance of appellants’ pleas;
(3) trial counsel was ineffective for failing to ensure that the guilty plea colloquy contained an on-the-record explanation of the elements of all crimes charged;
(4) appellants’ guilty pleas were induced by illegal detention, unlawful arrest, and illegally obtained statements;
(5) the trial judge improperly participated in the plea bargaining process;
(6) trial counsel was ineffective for failing to request a change of venue.
We have considered appellants’ contentions and find them to be without merit.
Affirmed.
Jurisdiction over this appeal is based upon section 202(1) of the Appellate Court Jurisdiction Act, 17 P.S. § 211.202(1) (Supp. 1978-79), and section 11 of the Post Conviction Hearing Act, 19 P.S. § 1180-11 (Supp. 1978-79).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
391 A.2d 1014, 480 Pa. 533, 1978 Pa. LEXIS 1024, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-geddes-pa-1978.