Commonwealth v. Gates
This text of 388 A.2d 747 (Commonwealth v. Gates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[463]*463ORDER
Appellant was convicted by a jury of murder in the second degree, robbery with a weapon, and unlawfully carrying a firearm without a license. He has appealed directly to this Court from the judgment of sentence for murder; appeals from the other convictions were certified to us by the Superior Court for consolidation with this appeal.
Appellant challenges the admission into evidence of two confessions on the grounds of denial of counsel, psychological coercion, and unreasonable delay in arraignment. We have examined the record and find these issues to be without merit. He also challenges admission of his statements by contending that they were tainted by pre-warning interrogation and resulted from an uninformed waiver of his constitutional rights. These issues have been waived for failure to comply with Rule 1123(a) and Commonwealth v. Blair, 460 Pa. 31, 331 A.2d 213 (1975).
Judgments of sentence affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
388 A.2d 747, 479 Pa. 461, 1978 Pa. LEXIS 742, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-gates-pa-1978.