Commonwealth v. Gaspero

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Gaspero

213 A.2d 88, 206 Pa. Super. 725, 1965 Pa. Super. LEXIS 929

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 9, 1965·No. Appeal, No. 278·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam :

The six judges who heard the argument of this appeal being equally divided in opinion, the judgment of sentence of the court below is affirmed and the defendant is directed to appear in the court below at such time as he may be there called, and that he be by that court committed until he has complied with the sentence, or any part of it which had not been performed at the time the appeal was made a supersedeas.

Flood, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam :

The six judges who heard the argument of this appeal being equally divided in opinion, the judgment of sentence of the court below is affirmed and the defendant is directed to appear in the court below at such time as he may be there called, and that he be by that court committed until he has complied with the sentence, or any part of it which had not been performed at the time the appeal was made a supersedeas.

Flood, J., absent.

Commonwealth v. Gaspero, 213 A.2d 88, 206 Pa. Super. 725, 1965 Pa. Super. LEXIS 929 (Pa. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

213 A.2d 88 (Commonwealth v. Gaspero) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related