Commonwealth v. Gary Lynn Jones

• Court: Court of Appeals of Virginia
• Decided: September 9, 1997
• Docket: 0857973
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Baker, Coleman and Overton Argued by Teleconference

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY v. Record No. 0857-97-3 JUDGE SAM W. COLEMAN III SEPTEMBER 9, 1997 GARY LYNN JONES

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF WYTHE COUNTY J. Colin Campbell, Judge Marla Graff Decker, Assistant Attorney General (Richard Cullen, Attorney General, on brief), for appellant.

No brief or argument for appellee.

The defendant, Gary Lynn Jones, filed a motion to suppress

methamphetamine and drug paraphernalia recovered in a traffic

stop on the ground that the police, after stopping the vehicle

for speeding, did not have probable cause to search the vehicle

in which he was a passenger. The trial court granted the

defendant's suppression motion, and the Commonwealth appeals that

ruling pursuant to Code § 19.2-398(2). The Commonwealth contends

on appeal that the defendant failed to prove he had standing to

challenge the search of the vehicle or the cooler in which the

contraband was found and that the trial court erred in finding

that the police did not have probable cause to conduct the

search.

Assuming without deciding that the defendant had standing to * Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication. challenge the search, we find that the police had probable cause

to search the vehicle and the cooler. Accordingly, we reverse

the trial court's ruling and remand the case for further

proceedings.

Because of the mobility of motor vehicles, the United States

Supreme Court has held that they may be searched without

obtaining a warrant if a police officer has probable cause to

believe that the vehicle contains contraband. See United States v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798, 806-08 (1982); Carroll v. United States,

267 U.S. 132, 149 (1925). "Probable cause exists when the facts

and circumstances within the arresting officer's knowledge and of

which he has reasonable trustworthy information are sufficient in

themselves to warrant a man of reasonable caution in the belief

that an offense [has] been or is being committed." Saunders v.

Commonwealth, 218 Va. 294, 300, 237 S.E.2d 150, 155 (1977).

In this case, we hold that Deputy Murphy had probable cause

to believe that the vehicle contained contraband and was

justified in conducting the search. After stopping the van for

speeding, Deputy Murphy, a motorcycle officer, noticed the odor

of "burnt" marijuana emanating from the van. See United States

v. Haley, 669 F.2d 201 (4th Cir. 1982) (holding that probable

cause to search a vehicle exists when an officer smells marijuana

inside the vehicle). He asked the defendant, who was in the

passenger seat, to exit the van. The deputy testified that,

"based on the fact that I had already smelled . . . marijuana

2 [and] knew a crime had been committed in the vehicle," he patted

the defendant down and found a "roach clip" in his pocket.

Deputy Murphy told the defendant it would be in his best interest

to turn over the marijuana, so the defendant retrieved a "Skoal"

tobacco box containing a partially burned marijuana cigarette

from the rear of the van and gave it to the deputy. Considering

the totality of the circumstances, including the odor of burnt

marijuana, the defendant's possession of a roach clip and the

defendant retrieving the "Skoal" container from the van which

contained marijuana, Deputy Murphy had probable cause to believe

that a crime was being committed and that the van may contain

contraband. Although Deputy Murphy initially intended to release the

defendant on a summons "if nothing else developed," after the

backup unit arrived, Deputy Murphy searched the van and found

methamphetamine and drug paraphernalia in a cooler behind the

passenger seat. The defendant acknowledged that the contraband

in the cooler belonged to him and he was arrested.

"The rationale justifying a warrantless search of an

automobile that is believed to be transporting contraband

arguably applies with equal force to any movable container that

is believed to be carrying an illicit substance." Ross, 456 U.S.

at 809. The cooler, which was in the vehicle, was a container in

which contraband of the type the deputy was searching for could

have been located, thus, the deputy was justified in searching

3 the cooler.

Accordingly, we reverse the trial court's ruling on the

suppression motion and remand for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.