Commonwealth v. Gagle
This text of 18 N.E. 417 (Commonwealth v. Gagle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon the facts of this case the Superior Court was not required, as matter of law, to set aside the verdict. It was within the discretion of that court to permit one of the jurors to remain in the jury-room under charge of an officer while the other jurors went for their supper. It was a temporary separation for a sufficient cause, which in no way prejudiced the rights of the defendant.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 N.E. 417, 147 Mass. 576, 1888 Mass. LEXIS 163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-gagle-mass-1888.