Commonwealth v. Fry

778 A.2d 623, 566 Pa. 84, 2001 Pa. LEXIS 1605
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 25, 2001
DocketPetition No. 118 W.D. Allocatur Docket 2001
StatusPublished

This text of 778 A.2d 623 (Commonwealth v. Fry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Fry, 778 A.2d 623, 566 Pa. 84, 2001 Pa. LEXIS 1605 (Pa. 2001).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 25th day of July, 2001, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, the order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for consideration on the merits. See Union Electric Corp. v. Bd. of Property Assessment, 560 Pa. 481, 746 A.2d 581 (2000) (allowing a nunc pro tunc appeal where the failure to comply with the timeliness requirement was caused by an administrative body’s misstatement of the deadline for filing an appeal); Commonwealth v. Coolbaugh, 770 A.2d 788 (Pa.Super.2001) (allowing an untimely appeal from the revocation of probation where the trial court misinformed the defendant of the appeal filing deadline).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Union Electric Corp. v. Board of Property Assessment, Appeals & Review
746 A.2d 581 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2000)
Commonwealth v. Coolbaugh
770 A.2d 788 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
778 A.2d 623, 566 Pa. 84, 2001 Pa. LEXIS 1605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-fry-pa-2001.