Commonwealth v. Frost

396 A.2d 822, 261 Pa. Super. 608
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 17, 1978·No. Appeal, No. 966·Published

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The order of the lower court is vacated and the case is remanded with instructions to the lower court to make findings on the parties’ respective [609]*609spendable incomes, see Commonwealth ex rel. Lipsky v. Lipsky, 214 Pa.Super. 215, 251 A.2d 729 (1969), and to enter a new order consistent with these findings.

VAN der VOORT, J., dissented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Frost, 396 A.2d 822, 261 Pa. Super. 608 (Pa. Ct. App. 1978).

396 A.2d 822 (Commonwealth v. Frost) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth ex rel. Lipsky v. Lipsky
251 A.2d 729 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1969)