Commonwealth v. Frost

396 A.2d 822, 261 Pa. Super. 608
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 17, 1978
DocketAppeal, No. 966
StatusPublished

This text of 396 A.2d 822 (Commonwealth v. Frost) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Frost, 396 A.2d 822, 261 Pa. Super. 608 (Pa. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The order of the lower court is vacated and the case is remanded with instructions to the lower court to make findings on the parties’ respective [609]*609spendable incomes, see Commonwealth ex rel. Lipsky v. Lipsky, 214 Pa.Super. 215, 251 A.2d 729 (1969), and to enter a new order consistent with these findings.

VAN der VOORT, J., dissented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth ex rel. Lipsky v. Lipsky
251 A.2d 729 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
396 A.2d 822, 261 Pa. Super. 608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-frost-pasuperct-1978.