Commonwealth v. Frost
This text of 13 Mass. 491 (Commonwealth v. Frost) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The enlistment of Frost in the company of artillery exempted him from liability to train in the standing company, to which he would otherwise have belonged. This enlistment was not void on account of his minority, though voidable by himself, had he chosen to have avoided it. The law, having made eighteen years the [393]*393age for military duty, necessarily gives the power at that age to enlist in any company, which is, in fact, a part of the militia. It is merely choosing the kind of militia service he would perform ; and to say, that the enlistment is not binding, would be to break up many independent companies, which may be considered the élite of the militia.
Proceedings quashed.
[See Sup. Rev. Stat., 1840, Chap. 92. — Ed.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 Mass. 491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-frost-mass-1816.