Commonwealth v. Frisby

324 A.2d 430, 227 Pa. Super. 497, 1974 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2102
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 3, 1974
DocketAppeal, No. 1961
StatusPublished

This text of 324 A.2d 430 (Commonwealth v. Frisby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Frisby, 324 A.2d 430, 227 Pa. Super. 497, 1974 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2102 (Pa. Ct. App. 1974).

Opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The appellant was charged with the sale of narcotic drugs to an undercover agent of the Pennsylvania State Police. He pled guilty to indictments charging violation of §4(q) of The Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act of 1961, 35 P.S. 780-4 (q), and was sentenced to 5 to 10 years under the Act.

This matter is before us on direct appeal and since it is not final, the appellant is entitled to be resentenced under the new Drug Act: “The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act.”1 See, Commonwealth v. Thomas, 450 Pa. 548, 301 A. 2d 359 (1973); Commonwealth v. Evans, 222 Pa. Superior Ct. 590, 296 A. 2d 844 (1972).

The case is remanded for resentencing under the new Drug Act.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Thomas
301 A.2d 359 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1973)
Commonwealth v. Evans
296 A.2d 844 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
324 A.2d 430, 227 Pa. Super. 497, 1974 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-frisby-pasuperct-1974.