Commonwealth v. Frisby
This text of 324 A.2d 430 (Commonwealth v. Frisby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion
The appellant was charged with the sale of narcotic drugs to an undercover agent of the Pennsylvania State Police. He pled guilty to indictments charging violation of §4(q) of The Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act of 1961, 35 P.S. 780-4 (q), and was sentenced to 5 to 10 years under the Act.
This matter is before us on direct appeal and since it is not final, the appellant is entitled to be resentenced under the new Drug Act: “The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act.”1 See, Commonwealth v. Thomas, 450 Pa. 548, 301 A. 2d 359 (1973); Commonwealth v. Evans, 222 Pa. Superior Ct. 590, 296 A. 2d 844 (1972).
The case is remanded for resentencing under the new Drug Act.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
324 A.2d 430, 227 Pa. Super. 497, 1974 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-frisby-pasuperct-1974.