Commonwealth v. Frioni

73 Pa. D. & C.2d 291, 1976 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 299
CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Beaver County
DecidedJanuary 5, 1976
Docketno. 919 of 1975
StatusPublished

This text of 73 Pa. D. & C.2d 291 (Commonwealth v. Frioni) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Beaver County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Frioni, 73 Pa. D. & C.2d 291, 1976 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 299 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1976).

Opinion

KLEIN, J.,

Appellant, William L. Frioni, appeals from his suspension under section 604(a)(4), which suspension further provides “. . . until sufficient proof [of restoration] from the authorities of the State of Nevada. . .”

[292]*292Appellant, a native of Pennsylvania, while a resident of Nevada had his operating privileges suspended by Nevada on December 9, 1970, for driving under the influence. The certified record from the National Driver Register also shows that appellant was eligible for restoration in Nevada on December 29, 1972. However, appellant returned to Pennsylvania in 1971; has been resident here ever since, and has not had his privileges restored by Nevada.

As a result of driving without a license, appellant was suspended by the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation for one month effective August 7, 1973, and for six months effective May 8, 1975, for driving during suspension of privilege to apply for a Pennsylvania operator’s license.

It is, of course, not feasible for appellant to return to Nevada to properly qualify for restoration there. Since the requirements for obtaining a Pennsylvania license are substantially similar to those in Nevada, it seems to us that simple justice dictates that appellant be given an opportunity to do so; “. . . the statute must be given a common-sense interpretation”: Commonwealth v. Walkinshaw, 373 Pa. 419, 96 A. 2d 384 (1953).

For these reasons, we enter the following

ORDER

And now, January 5, 1976, it is ordered and directed that the Department of Transportation permit appellant, William L. Frioni, to apply for a learner’s permit and further permit appellant to seek to meet the requirements for obtaining an operator’s license under the law, e.g., physical and eye examinations, test for knowledge of the applicable law, regulations and rules of the road, driving ability, no-fault insurance coverage, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Walkinshaw
96 A.2d 384 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 Pa. D. & C.2d 291, 1976 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-frioni-pactcomplbeaver-1976.