Commonwealth v. Friend

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Friend

101 Pa. Super. 480, 1930 Pa. Super. LEXIS 129

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 22, 1930

DocketAppeal 31

StatusPublished

This text of 101 Pa. Super. 480 (Commonwealth v. Friend) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Friend, 101 Pa. Super. 480, 1930 Pa. Super. LEXIS 129 (Pa. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Gawthrop, J.,

This is a separate appeal by Harry J. Friend from a sentence following a conviction on a bill charging him and Edmund B. Jermyn and others with conspiracy. Although appellant and Jermyn were tried together, their appeals were argued on different sets of paper books and each is entitled to separate judgment on his own appeal, according as the same may be determined to have substantial merit, or otherwise. No question is raised in this appeal that was not considered in the opinion this day filed in No. 30, February Term, 1930.

For the reasons given in that opinion, the judgment is affirmed and it is ordered that the defendant, *482 Harry J. Friend, appear in the court below at such time as he may be there called, and that he be by that court committed until he has complied with the sentence, or any part of it, which had not been performed at the time the appeal in this case was made a supersedeas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Gawthrop, J.,

This is a separate appeal by Harry J. Friend from a sentence following a conviction on a bill charging him and Edmund B. Jermyn and others with conspiracy. Although appellant and Jermyn were tried together, their appeals were argued on different sets of paper books and each is entitled to separate judgment on his own appeal, according as the same may be determined to have substantial merit, or otherwise. No question is raised in this appeal that was not considered in the opinion this day filed in No. 30, February Term, 1930.

For the reasons given in that opinion, the judgment is affirmed and it is ordered that the defendant, *482 Harry J. Friend, appear in the court below at such time as he may be there called, and that he be by that court committed until he has complied with the sentence, or any part of it, which had not been performed at the time the appeal in this case was made a supersedeas.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

101 Pa. Super. 480, 1930 Pa. Super. LEXIS 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-friend-pasuperct-1930.