Commonwealth v. Freeman

143 A.3d 888, 636 Pa. 388
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 17, 2016·No. No. 870 MAL 2015·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 17th day of February, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED on the issue of whether [389]*389Petitioner’s sentence violates the prohibition against mandatory life sentences for juvenile offenders announced by the Supreme Court of the United States in Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012). As a result of the recent holding by that Court that Miller must be applied retroactively by the States, see Montgomery v. Louisiana, — U.S.-, 136 S.Ct. 718, 193 L.Ed.2d 599 (2016), the Superior Court’s order is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with Montgomery.

To the extent necessary, leave is to be granted to amend the post-conviction petition to assert the jurisdictional provision of the Post Conviction Relief Act extending to the recognition of constitutional rights by the Supreme Court of the United States which it deems to be retroactive. See 42 Pa.C.S. § 9545(b)(l)(iii).

Justice EAKIN did not participate in the decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Freeman, 143 A.3d 888, 636 Pa. 388 (Pa. 2016).

143 A.3d 888 (Commonwealth v. Freeman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller v. Alabama
132 S. Ct. 2455 (Supreme Court, 2012)
Montgomery v. Louisiana
577 U.S. 190 (Supreme Court, 2016)