Commonwealth v. Franklin
This text of 4 U.S. 221 (Commonwealth v. Franklin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— The second count in the indictment is founded upon the second section of the act of assembly; and the special verdict [230]*230finds expressly, that the defendants did conspire for the purpose mentioned in that section. The purpose was, “ to lay out townships in the county of Luzerne, by persons not appointed or acknowledged by the laws of this commonwealth.” Now, the term township indicates a local jurisdiction, for objects of local police, with powers and officers to effectuate the jurisdiction ; and a conspiracy by individuals to erect such townships, is an encroachment upon the rights and authority of the state. It is an offence indictable at common law; and the legislature, with a view more effectually to prevent its commission, had an unquestionable power to increase the punishment.
As to the first section of the act of assembly, I am not prepared to pronounce, that it is unconstitutional; and, consequently, I could not, even on that ground, decide, at present, to arrest the judgment. But it is enough, to observe, that, on the finding of the jury, I shall be ready to give judgment for the commonwealth, on the second count of the indictment, when the subject is brought before us in the circuit court.
The cause was argued upon the other objections in arrest of judgment, before the supreme court, in December term 1804. See post, p. 316.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 U.S. 221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-franklin-pa-1802.