Commonwealth v. Foster

968 A.2d 224
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 5, 2009
StatusPublished

This text of 968 A.2d 224 (Commonwealth v. Foster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Foster, 968 A.2d 224 (Pa. 2009).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 5th day of March 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Did the Superior Court err in determining that [Respondent’s] challenge to the application of a mandatory minimum sentence was a non-waivable challenge to the legality of the sentence despite the fact that the sentence did not exceed the statutory maximum sentence for the crime of which he was convicted?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
968 A.2d 224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-foster-pa-2009.