Commonwealth v. Fortune
105 Mass. 592
Opinion
It is very obvious that several persons may associate themselves together in an attempt to steal from one’s person. In such cases, they are all principals, and may be jointly indicted. 1 Archb. Crbn. Proc. (7th Am. ed.) 315 and notes. Goal-heavers' ease, 1 Leach (4th ed.) 64. Though but one of them thrusts his hand into the pocket, all may be equally guilty; and though the indictment alleges that they all did so, yet proof that one did so is sufficient. The ruling was correct.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Fortune, 105 Mass. 592 (Mass. 1870).
105 Mass. 592 (Commonwealth v. Fortune) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Vogel v. State
119 N.W. 190 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1909)
People v. Marble
38 Mich. 117 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1878)