Commonwealth v. Ford

15 N.E. 153, 146 Mass. 131, 1888 Mass. LEXIS 211
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided February 6, 1888·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

Under the Pub. Sts. c. 169, § 19, the conviction of a witness of any crime, whether a felony or a misdemeanor, may be shown to affect his credibility. Commonwealth v. Hall, 4 Allen, 305.

It is to be presumed that proper instructions were given; and such instructions necessarily implied that the jury could not act by a majority, and that each juror must act upon his own convictions. The judge was not required to repeat these principles, which every juror must have understood. Whether he should do so was within his discretion, and no exception lies to his refusal to give the further instructions at the time and in the form requested by the defendant. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Ford, 15 N.E. 153, 146 Mass. 131, 1888 Mass. LEXIS 211 (Mass. 1888).

15 N.E. 153 (Commonwealth v. Ford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Rollins
241 N.E.2d 809 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1968)
Hoffman v. People
212 P. 848 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1923)
Rittenberg v. Smith
101 N.E. 989 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1913)
Commonwealth v. Walsh
82 N.E. 19 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1907)
Koch v. State
106 N.W. 531 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1906)
State v. Henson
50 A. 468 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1901)
Commonwealth v. Cosseboom
29 N.E. 463 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1892)