Commonwealth v. Foran

110 Mass. 179
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1872
StatusPublished
Cited by24 cases

This text of 110 Mass. 179 (Commonwealth v. Foran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Foran, 110 Mass. 179 (Mass. 1872).

Opinion

Morton, J.

The statute which provides that “the courts shall not charge juries with respect to matters of fact,” prohibits the expression by the judge in his charge to the jury of his opinion as to the credibility of witnesses. Gen. Sts. e. 115, § 5. Commonwealth v. Barry, 9 Allen, 276. In the case at bar a witness for the government testified that he bought liquor of the defendant for the purpose of testifying against him. The presiding judge instructed the jury that “ if the witness, intending honestly to aid the government in breaking up a traffic forbidden by law, visited the place where the law was supposed to be violated, for the purpose of obtaining evidence, it would not detract from the weight of his testimony in the opinion of the court.” We are of opinion that this instruction was erroneous. Whether the circumstances under which the witness obtained evidence, and the motives under which he acted, would or would not detract from the weight of his testimony, was a question exclusively for the jury. Although an instruction was added that “ the whole matter was before the jury to give such weight to the testimony as they saw fit,” yet the effect of the whole instructions was to throw the weight of the judge’s opinion in the scales against tne defendant. This was a violation of the rule prescribed by the statute. Exceptions sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gleason v. Source Perrier, S.A.
553 N.E.2d 544 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1990)
Commonwealth v. Perez
455 N.E.2d 632 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1983)
Gauntlett v. Medical Parameters, Inc.
405 N.E.2d 1003 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1980)
Commonwealth v. Rodriguez
383 N.E.2d 851 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1978)
Commonwealth v. Sumpter
368 N.E.2d 817 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1977)
Commonwealth v. Perry
329 N.E.2d 150 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1975)
Commonwealth v. Borges
316 N.E.2d 627 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1974)
Commonwealth v. Kirker
285 N.E.2d 108 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1972)
Quinn v. Stoneham Laundry, Inc.
275 N.E.2d 346 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1971)
Commonwealth v. Desmond
188 N.E.2d 856 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1963)
Moynihan v. Jacobs
186 N.E.2d 448 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1962)
Salter v. Leventhal
151 N.E.2d 275 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1958)
Cahalane v. Poust
132 N.E.2d 660 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1956)
Hohman v. Hemmen
182 N.E. 850 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1932)
Bernasconi v. Bassi
158 N.E. 341 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1927)
State v. Bouchard
149 P. 464 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1915)
Plummer v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
84 N.E. 849 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1908)
State v. Oliphant
107 S.W. 32 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1908)
Partelow v. Newton & Boston Street Railway Co.
81 N.E. 894 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1907)
Commonwealth v. Flynn
42 N.E. 562 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1896)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 Mass. 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-foran-mass-1872.