Commonwealth v. Fleischman

291 A.2d 874, 221 Pa. Super. 482, 1972 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1560
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 16, 1972·No. Appeal, No. 444·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Hoffman, J.,

Appellant was a co-defendant of Paul Fleming whose case was decided by this Court this even date. See Commonwealth v. Fleming, 221. Pa. Superior Ct. 481, 291 A. 2d 874 (1972).

Appellant took the same position as did Fleming with respect to the suppression of evidence against him at trial, and he is likewise entitled to a new trial under the authority of Commonwealth v. Shaw, 444 Pa. 110, 281 A. 2d 897 (1971).

The judgment of sentence is vacated and a new trial is ordered.

Watkins, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Fleischman, 291 A.2d 874, 221 Pa. Super. 482, 1972 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1560 (Pa. Ct. App. 1972).

291 A.2d 874 (Commonwealth v. Fleischman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Brown
299 A.2d 44 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1972)