Commonwealth v. Fisher

264 A.2d 689, 439 Pa. 87, 1970 Pa. LEXIS 660
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 28, 1970
DocketAppeal, No. 196
StatusPublished

This text of 264 A.2d 689 (Commonwealth v. Fisher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Fisher, 264 A.2d 689, 439 Pa. 87, 1970 Pa. LEXIS 660 (Pa. 1970).

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Chibe Justice Bell,

The appellant, Richard Fisher, was convicted by a jury of voluntary manslaughter. Following denial of his motion for a new trial and imposition of sentence, he filed this appeal.

The sole issue raised by this appeal is whether the trial Judge committed reversible error when he instructed the jury that the defendant has the burden of [88]*88proving bis assertion of self-defense by a fair preponderance of tbe evidence.

In tbe recent case of Commonwealth v. Winebrenner, 439 Pa. 73, 265 A. 2d 108, we reviewed tbis issue at great length, and once again we reaffirmed a score of prior decisions of tbis Court which held that self-defense was an affirmative defense and tbe defendant bad tbe burden of proving self-defense by a fair preponderance of tbe evidence.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Winebrenner
265 A.2d 108 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
264 A.2d 689, 439 Pa. 87, 1970 Pa. LEXIS 660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-fisher-pa-1970.