Commonwealth v. Fisher

264 A.2d 689, 439 Pa. 87, 1970 Pa. LEXIS 660
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commonwealth v. Fisher. Read the opinion of the Court — 447 Pa. 405
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 28, 1970·No. Appeal, No. 196·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Chibe Justice Bell,

The appellant, Richard Fisher, was convicted by a jury of voluntary manslaughter. Following denial of his motion for a new trial and imposition of sentence, he filed this appeal.

The sole issue raised by this appeal is whether the trial Judge committed reversible error when he instructed the jury that the defendant has the burden of [88]*88proving bis assertion of self-defense by a fair preponderance of tbe evidence.

In tbe recent case of Commonwealth v. Winebrenner, 439 Pa. 73, 265 A. 2d 108, we reviewed tbis issue at great length, and once again we reaffirmed a score of prior decisions of tbis Court which held that self-defense was an affirmative defense and tbe defendant bad tbe burden of proving self-defense by a fair preponderance of tbe evidence.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Fisher, 264 A.2d 689, 439 Pa. 87, 1970 Pa. LEXIS 660 (Pa. 1970).

264 A.2d 689 (Commonwealth v. Fisher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Winebrenner
265 A.2d 108 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1970)