Commonwealth v. Finnegan

109 Mass. 363
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided March 15, 1872·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

The bill of exceptions does not show any error in the instructions upon any point made at the trial. The instruction requested was rightly refused. The indictment charged the defendant with keeping a tenement used for the illegal sale and illegal keeping of intoxicating liquors, and would be supported by proof of keeping a tenement used for either of the purposes thus alleged, and so the jury were instructed. Commonwealth v. Welsh, 1 Allen, 1. Commonwealth v. Carolin, 2 Allen, 169. Commonwealth v. Heffron, 102 Mass. 148.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Finnegan, 109 Mass. 363 (Mass. 1872).

109 Mass. 363 (Commonwealth v. Finnegan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Lang
63 Me. 215 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1874)