Commonwealth v. Fields
64 A.3d 628, 619 Pa. 398, 2013 Pa. LEXIS 587
This text of 64 A.3d 628 (Commonwealth v. Fields) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Fields, 64 A.3d 628, 619 Pa. 398, 2013 Pa. LEXIS 587 (Pa. 2013).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 28th day of March, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Did the Superior Court disregard the plain language of the “second strike” mandatory sentencing provision of the repeat-violent-offender statute when it held that the provision applied to only one of the multiple crimes of violence that [respondent], a previously-convicted rapist and burglar, committed in a later, second criminal episode in which he again raped a woman and burglarized her home?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Fields, R.
107 A.3d 738 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2014)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
64 A.3d 628, 619 Pa. 398, 2013 Pa. LEXIS 587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-fields-pa-2013.