Commonwealth v. Farris

278 A.2d 906, 443 Pa. 251, 1971 Pa. LEXIS 909
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJune 28, 1971
DocketAppeals, 245 and 305
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 278 A.2d 906 (Commonwealth v. Farris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Farris, 278 A.2d 906, 443 Pa. 251, 1971 Pa. LEXIS 909 (Pa. 1971).

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Eagen,

Emanuel Farris, fourteen years of age, after the filing of a delinquency petition and a counseled evidentiary hearing before a judge sitting in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia, Family Court Division, was held for further proceedings before a grand jury. At the hearing evidence was introduced that Farris fatally stabbed another youth in the back without provocation during a street gang fight. He was subsequently indicted by a grand jury for murder, voluntary manslaughter and involuntary manslaughter.

*253 Through counsel, Farris filed motions in the Court of Common Pleas, Trial Division, Criminal Section of Philadelphia requesting the court to quash the indictments and to return the case to the Family Court Division for disposition. After a hearing, during which it was disclosed that Farris had previously committed acts in violation of the criminal laws and was committed to a correctional institution from which he committed an escape, these motions were denied. A timely appeal from this order was then filed. Counsel subsequently filed a petition requesting that Farris be released on bail pending trial. From the order denying this motion, an appeal was also filed. Both appeals were consolidated for argument before this Court.

The order refusing to quash the indictments and to return the case to the Family Court Division for disposition is an interlocutory order which is unappealable, and the appeal (No. 245) entered therefrom will be quashed.

Since evidence offered at the preliminary hearing in the Family Court Division established a prima facie case of murder in the first degree, the court below did not err in refusing to release Farris on bail pending trial, and its order to this effect will be affirmed.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Pal
34 Pa. D. & C.5th 524 (Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas, 2013)
Commonwealth v. Woomer
8 Pa. D. & C.5th 178 (Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas, 2009)
Commonwealth v. Hamborsky
75 Pa. D. & C.4th 505 (Fayette County Court, 2005)
Commonwealth v. Heiser
478 A.2d 1355 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1984)
Commonwealth v. Bennett
345 A.2d 754 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1975)
Commonwealth v. Rucco
324 A.2d 388 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1974)
Revty v. Commonwealth
358 F. Supp. 258 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1973)
Commonwealth v. Truesdale
296 A.2d 829 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
278 A.2d 906, 443 Pa. 251, 1971 Pa. LEXIS 909, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-farris-pa-1971.