Commonwealth v. Farrand
This text of 78 Mass. 177 (Commonwealth v. Farrand) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
All the facts, which are necessary to constitute the offence for which a person is indicted, must be alleged in the indictment, and must be proved on the trial; otherwise, he cannot be legally convicted. No facts, that are not necessary to constitute the offence, need be alleged or proved, in order to support the indictment. Hence, as it has been decided, in Commonwealth v. Kelly, ante, 175, that an indictment on St. 1855, c. 405, need not allege any other fact besides the keeping or maintaining of a building, place or tenement, used for the illegal sale or illegal keeping of intoxicating liquors, it follows that, in the trial of such an indictment, no other fact need be proved, in order to warrant a conviction by verdict and by judgment. Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
78 Mass. 177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-farrand-mass-1858.