Commonwealth v. FAR

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. FAR

17 A.3d 922, 610 Pa. 11

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 26, 2011·No. 435 EAL 2010, 436 EAL 2010, 437 EAL 2010·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 26th day of April, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, reworded for clarity, is:

*12 When a case that was transferred from the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas to Philadelphia Municipal Court is later transferred back to the Court of Common Pleas, is the case governed by Pa.R.Crim.P. 600, the prompt trial rule applicable to the Court of Common Pleas or Pa.R.Crim.P. 1013, the prompt trial rule applicable to the Philadelphia Municipal Court?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 26th day of April, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, reworded for clarity, is:

*12 When a case that was transferred from the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas to Philadelphia Municipal Court is later transferred back to the Court of Common Pleas, is the case governed by Pa.R.Crim.P. 600, the prompt trial rule applicable to the Court of Common Pleas or Pa.R.Crim.P. 1013, the prompt trial rule applicable to the Philadelphia Municipal Court?

Commonwealth v. FAR, 17 A.3d 922, 610 Pa. 11 (Pa. 2011).

Pincite

17 A.3d 922 (Commonwealth v. FAR) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related