Commonwealth v. Fant, R.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Fant, R.

121 A.3d 432, 632 Pa. 444, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 1716

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided August 7, 2015·No. 171 MAL 2015 (Granted)·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of August, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue is:

*445 Whether the Superior Court committed an error of law/ abuse of discretion in its February 9, 2015 Opinion and Order, in reversing the trial court suppression order based upon its own definition of “telephone calls” and overstepping its standard of review by placing itself as a fact-finder, instead of accepting the findings of fact espoused by the trial court, which were sufficiently supported by the evidence elicited at the suppression hearing?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of August, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue is:

*445 Whether the Superior Court committed an error of law/ abuse of discretion in its February 9, 2015 Opinion and Order, in reversing the trial court suppression order based upon its own definition of “telephone calls” and overstepping its standard of review by placing itself as a fact-finder, instead of accepting the findings of fact espoused by the trial court, which were sufficiently supported by the evidence elicited at the suppression hearing?

Commonwealth v. Fant, R., 121 A.3d 432, 632 Pa. 444, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 1716 (Pa. 2015).

Pincite

121 A.3d 432 (Commonwealth v. Fant, R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.