Commonwealth v. Enimpah

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Enimpah

78 A.3d 613, 621 Pa. 358, 2013 WL 5733740, 2013 Pa. LEXIS 2434

DecidedOctober 22, 2013

StatusPublished

This text of 78 A.3d 613 (Commonwealth v. Enimpah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Enimpah, 78 A.3d 613, 621 Pa. 358, 2013 WL 5733740, 2013 Pa. LEXIS 2434 (Pa. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 22nd day of October, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by the Commonwealth, is:

Should this Honorable Court grant the Petition for Allowance of Appeal because, the Superior Court has held that [the] Commonwealth has a burden of production at suppression hearings when the [djefendant has not satisfied his threshold burden of establishing a reasonable expectation of privacy in the areas searched or the items seized?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 22nd day of October, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by the Commonwealth, is:

Should this Honorable Court grant the Petition for Allowance of Appeal because, the Superior Court has held that [the] Commonwealth has a burden of production at suppression hearings when the [djefendant has not satisfied his threshold burden of establishing a reasonable expectation of privacy in the areas searched or the items seized?

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 A.3d 613, 621 Pa. 358, 2013 WL 5733740, 2013 Pa. LEXIS 2434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-enimpah-pa-2013.