Commonwealth v. Empowerment Board of Control of the Chester-Upland School District

939 A.2d 324
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 27, 2007·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of December, 2007, the appeal is hereby QUASHED. This court’s affirmance of the Commonwealth Court’s order dated April 16, 2007 by opinion and Order at Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Dep’t of Education v. Chester-Upland Special Board of Control et al., — Pa. -, 938 A.2d 1000 (2007), granting the Department of Education’s Application to Substitute Parties has the effect of substituting the Empowerment Board of Control of the Chester-Upland School District for the Special Board of Control of the Chester-Upland School District. Therefore, the Special Board of Control of the Chester-Upland School District is no longer a party to this appeal. See, e.g., Blackwell v. Commonwealth, State Ethics Comm’n, 523 Pa. 347, 567 A.2d 630 (1989) (holding quashal is appropriate when entity was “out of existence”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Empowerment Board of Control of the Chester-Upland School District, 939 A.2d 324 (Pa. 2007).

939 A.2d 324 (Commonwealth v. Empowerment Board of Control of the Chester-Upland School District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth, Department of Education v. Empowerment Board of Control
938 A.2d 1000 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2007)
Blackwell v. Com., State Ethics Com'n
567 A.2d 630 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1989)