Commonwealth v. Eisen
934 A.2d 691
This text of 934 A.2d 691 (Commonwealth v. Eisen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Eisen, 934 A.2d 691 (Pa. 2007).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 18th day of October, 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Whether a second PCRA petition invoking the after-discovered evidence exception to the PCRA’s one year filing requirement was filed “within 60 days of the date the claim could have been presented” under 42 Pa.C.S. § 9545 where the petition was filed within 60 days of the conclusion of Petitioner’s federal ha-beas corpus proceedings and where the filing of the petition prior to the conclusion of the federal proceedings would have jeopardized the Petitioner’s federal review of his then-existing habeas corpus claims and/or his after-discovered evidence claim.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
§ 9545
Pennsylvania § 9545
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
934 A.2d 691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-eisen-pa-2007.