Commonwealth v. Eisen
934 A.2d 691, 594 Pa. 10, 2007 Pa. LEXIS 2186
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 18, 2007·No. Petition Nos. 609 & 610 WAL 2006·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 18th day of October, 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Whether a second PCRA petition invoking the after-discovered evidence exception to the PCRA’s one year filing [11]*11requirement was filed “within 60 days of the date the claim could have been presented” under 42 Pa.C.S. § 9545 where the petition was filed within 60 days of the conclusion of Petitioner’s federal habeas corpus proceedings and where the filing of the petition prior to the conclusion of the federal proceedings would have jeopardized the Petitioner’s federal review of his then-existing habeas corpus claims and/or his after-discovered evidence claim.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Eisen, 934 A.2d 691, 594 Pa. 10, 2007 Pa. LEXIS 2186 (Pa. 2007).
934 A.2d 691 (Commonwealth v. Eisen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Summons of Director, Women Organized Against Rape
30 Pa. D. & C.3d 295 (Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, 1984)