Commonwealth v. Egleston
This text of 424 A.2d 509 (Commonwealth v. Egleston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
Following a non-jury trial, appellant was found guilty of murder of the third degree and possessing an instrument of a crime. He was sentenced to concurrent terms of incarceration of five to ten years and two and one-half to five years. In this direct appeal appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, asserts that the weapons offense merged into the murder conviction, and contends that the prosecutor committed acts of misconduct in attempting to introduce irrelevant and prejudicial evidence.
After reviewing the record, we find these claims to be without merit. Consequently, the judgments of sentence are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
424 A.2d 509, 492 Pa. 284, 1981 Pa. LEXIS 680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-egleston-pa-1981.